|
News Articles Internet
Articles (2007) Books
|
Whenor rather, ifhistory correctly critiques
President George W. Bush's war on terrorism, it will be forced to concede
it is a war that was started by Muslim extremists when Islamic fundamentalists
under the Ayatollah The "Jihad" actually began on October 23, 1983 when a Palestinian Hezbollah suicide bomber ran the barricades around the barracks of the US Marines Peacekeeping force in Beirut, Lebanon. The terrorist detonated the bomb, killing himself and 241 American servicemen. Unfortunately, the western world did not recognize it as the start of a Jihad. As far as they were concerned, it was an isolated act of terrorism by Islamic fanatics against American intruders. Although the Reagan Administration learned that the Hezbollah terrorists who carried out the attack were trained at a terrorist camp deep in Iran, the United States did not retaliate against Iran. Perhaps it should have. On October 7, 1985 fivePalestinian Liberation Front
terrorists seized control of the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro
and threatened to kill all 400 passengers unless the Israeli government
freed 50 Palestinian terrorists who were in their custody. To show the
world they meant business, the PLF leader, Abu Abbas, pushed Once the Italian government agreed that the Palestinian terrorists would face the same justice in Sicily as they would have in the United States, Reagan called off the troops and let the Italians take charge of the prosecution of the Achille Lauro hijackers. Unfortunately the Italians released Abu Abbas, the PLF leader, claiming it did not have enough evidence to prosecute him. Later, Abbas was indicted and tried in absentia. When he was apprehended a few years later, he was sentenced to prison for life. Abbas was paroled about five years ago and recently died. The Achille Lauro attack signaled the start of a two decade-long wave of terrorism against America and Americans that ever so slowly escalated in size and severity until finally, on September 11, 2001, one triple-pronged terrorist attack resulted in the deaths of over 3,000 Americans and scores of European and Asia citizens on American soil. On April 5, 1986 a bomb exploded in a West Berlin discotheque frequented by American military personnel. Of the 200 injured, 63 were Americans. One American soldier and one German civilian were killed in the blast. On the night and morning of April 15-16, 1986, the US launched airstrikes against several ground targets in Libya. One of the targets was a residence in which Moumar Gadafaffi and his family were sleeping. Members of Gadafaffi's family were killed in the airstrike. As the raid was taking place, Reagan addressed the nation and told the American people that the CIA and DIA had irrefutable proof that Gadafaffi ordered the attack on the nightclub. Reagan, Bush-41 and Bush-43 responded to the Jihadists with lethal force. America stood tall, talked tough, and backed up their rhetoric with a big stick. Former navy lieutenant jg Jimmy Carter and former draft dodger Bill Clinton talked boldly during the press photo ops for the American mainstream media, but brandished a twig from an olive branch as its "lethal weapon" of choice. Clinton, who hated the military almost as much as Democratic nominee John F. Kerry, was ill-equipped for his role as commander-in-chief since he did not want the American military involved in any action that was not controlled by the United Nations. When he was forced, through circumstances (and public opinion polls) to act, his actions were usually too little, too lateif at all. Although top Clinton aides insisted to the 9-11
Commission on Friday, March 19, 2004 that the Clintons had warned
the incoming Bush-43 Administration in 2001 that bin Laden was the most
dangerous threat facing America, Clinton didn't act as In the fall of 1998, the National Security Agency triangulated the exact location of Osama bin Laden and wanted to act on a pre-approved White House plan to take him out with Tomahawk Cruise missiles. When bin Laden was targeted, the NSA reported to National Security Director Sandy Berger that they had a two-hour window during which they could kill him. Clinton was too busy to be bothered with the "most dangerous threat facing America." He wouldn't even take Berger's calls. It was an hour before Clinton called him back. When Berger told Clinton the window to nail bin Laden was closing fast, Clinton said that before he would give the go-ahead he wanted to meet with Secretaries Madeleine Albright and William Cohnand then he wanted to mull over his options and the potential consequences of those actionsbefore deciding whether it was politically advisable to take out bin Laden at that time. Had Clinton taken bin Laden out in 1998 when he had a two-hour window and an ample supply of Cruise missiles to get the job done, there is a good chance 9-11 would not have happened. Clinton was just as ineffective when the American
embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar al-Salaam, Tanzania were bombed by
terrorists working for Osama bin Laden on August 7, 1998. Clinton ordered
about 40 Tomahawk Cruise missiles fired into the In fact, bin Laden apparently posed such a dangerous, imminent threat to America that when the Sudanese government offered to arrest bin Laden and turn him over to the US Justice Department, Clinton said "Thanks, but no thanks." All of this, I remind you, on top of the fact that al Qaeda had already engineered the first bombing of the World Trade Center and had already shown a propensity to bring their Holy War to America. If Clinton had the backbone of Ronald Reagan or the grit of George W. Bush, the War on Terrorism might have been waged exclusively on the soil and in the skies over the nations who harbored terrorists and financially sponsored Islamic terrorism. Clinton, however, choose to abrogate his constitutional responsibilities as commander-in-chief of the US military and left his war for his successor to fight because his Hollywood supporters did not think it was politically correct to fight it. And in less time than it took Bill Clinton to lose 38 men in a lopsided battle against a local warlord in an ill-fated peacekeeping mission in Somalia, George W. Bush deposed the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq. When you are the world's only superpower, winning the wars are easy. Winning the peace is tougher because no nation, standing alone, can do it. Particularly when half of the Congress and all of the elite filmmakers in Hollywood (who shape public opinion in the nation and around the world) wanted Bush to fail in order to seize back not only the White House but both Houses of Congress in November 2004. Peace requires a unified community effort. Granted, suicide bomber attackssupported financially
by the oil sheiks in the Mideast and the governments of Iran, Syria and
Saudi Arabiahave increased dramatically not only in Iraq and Israel,
but in several non-Muslim nations around the LibyaReagan's old nemesiswatched what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq and decided it was wise to renounced weapons of mass destruction. Gadafaffi is now allowing weapons inspectors into the country, and Libyan officials are assisting those inspectors dismantle Libya's weapons systems that cannot be construed as "defensive systems " North Korea, which was working hard to build a nuclear devise with the help of Pakistan (right under the nose of the Clinton Administration) has once again agreed to destroy what they have for food (after threatening to produce a nuclear devise if the Bush Administration did not provide millions of tons of food). When Bush did not back down, Kim Jong II did. Even with the death and bloodshed caused by the desperate acts of desperate men in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Israel, in Indonesia and in Spain and elsewhere around the world where callous, hate-filled extremists indiscriminately kill the innocent to incite fear in everyone else, the world is still a much safer place today than it was before American troops went into Afghanistan and Iraq. By the nature of the act, terrorism is a horrible, malignant cancer that feeds not only on its victims but on the witnesses to the act as well. If you have a cancer, and it is removed, are you cancer-free the moment that malignancy is removed? Of course not. The roots of cancer goes deep. Before you can be construed as cancer-free you will likely undergo a long and unpleasant regiment of chemotherapy. The therapy may last for a year or twoor even longer. In any event, the cure takes much longer than the initial battle in which the cancer was excised from your body. There's not a whole lot of difference between this analogy and that of winning the war and assuring the peace. The war ends when the visible cancer is removed. But until the roots are excised, the health of the patient cannot be guaranteed. |

Copyright ©
Jon Christian Ryter.
All rights reserved.