Jon Christian Ryter's Conservative World

Eagle

Internet Articles (2015)
Internet Articles (2014)
Internet Articles (2013)
Internet Articles (2012)
Internet Articles (2011)
Internet Articles (2010)
Internet Articles (2009)
Internet Articles (2008)
Internet Articles (2007)
Internet Articles (2006)
Internet Articles (2005)
Internet Articles (2004)
Internet Articles (2003)
Internet Articles (2002)
Internet Articles (2001)

From The Mailbag

20 years

How does a British-Kenyan citizen
with no ties to the United States
overthrow the American Republic?
What appears on the surface to be one, simple unanswered question is, in realty, several unanswered questions packaged as one. The United States Constitution outlines precisely who, and under what specific circumstances, can run for the office of President of the United States. Keep in mind, the drafting of the US Constitution began on May 25, 1787 with a quorum of members present at the Pennsylvania State House (renamed Independence Hall), and finalized on Sept. 17, 1787. Why is that germane? Because the laws enacted and enforced under the Articles of Confederation dealing with citizenship as well as the laws concerning what constituted being a natural citizen in 1787 are different than the verbiage in Article II of the Constitution that qualifies a candidate seeking office for the office he seeks. Had the Articles of Confederation remained the law of the land, Barack Obama would have been qualified to run for the office of President of the United States.

Specifically, Article II says: "No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of 35 years, and been 14 years resident within the United States."

Obviously, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was not a citizen, or even a resident, of the United States at the time of the Constitution's adoption since he would not be born for another 174 years. The $64 question is: was he ever a citizen, of any type, of the United States since 1961; and if so, where is the indisputable, or even circumstantial, evidence of that citizenship? Nordyke Twins There is a ton of circumstantial evidence that says he is not, and never was, a citizen of the United States, but none—under close examination—that says he was.

Forensically, Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio proved that Barack Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was a forgery. So was his driver's license, his Social Security card and his Selective Service card. Obama's birth certificate appears to belong to a girl named Virginia Sunahara who was born on August 4, 1961 at the Wahiawa Hospital and died the following day at the Kapi'olani Hospital where doctors could not save her life. Here comes the first big question buried in the original question: Sequentially, the number of the birth certificate issued to Virginia Sunahara should have been 61 10651. How do we know that? Because her birth immediately followed the birth of Susan and Gretchen Nordyke, twin girls who were the 10,637th and 10,638th babies born in Hawaii in 1961. Sunahara was the 639th. Obama, who now carries Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate, was actually born at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, British East Africa (Kenya) and that he did not arrive in Hawaii until Aug. 8, 1961—4 days after his birth. Stanley Ann Dunham Obama didn't realize the ramifications of her son being born in Mombasa, Kenya but her mother, Madelyn Dunham did. Her grandson was not an American citizen. She set about fabricating the lie that would help him get the Hawaiian birth certificate he needed to be an American, rather than Kenyan, citizen. Her subterfuge began with the posting of birth announcements in the Honolulu Star Bulletin and the Honolulu Advertiser which said "...Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama of 6085 Kalanianaole Highway gave birth to a son on Aug. 4, 1961." Dunham knew that to claim a certificate of live birth in Hawaii a person not born in one of the State hospitals need only supply two pieces of evidence confirming the live birth did take place in Hawaii. Dunham apparently didn't realize the law meant two witnesses other than the parents who were present at the live birth, not two birth announcements.

However, since Sunahara was born and died within 24 hours, those who borrowed her birth certificate, believed to have been Loretta Fuddy, Public Health Director (who actually produced what she said was the original Obama birth certificate) didn't think anyone would think about the Sunahara baby since she never lived beyond a very brief visit at two hospitals in Honolulu. Her birth certificate number was 61 11080—or 339 births after she was born before it was logged into the Hawaiian birth records. Fuddy needed to park Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate somewhere and, one imagines, 61 11080 was the first available parking space in Hawaii's birth records.

On Dec. 11, 2013 Fuddy was one of 9 passengers on an airplane piloted by Clyde Kawasaki. The plane, according to the survivors (everyone except Fuddy) experienced engine problems and had to ditch in the ocean, a few hundred yards from the shore. Fuddy, who had just been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury to explain her role in "finding" Obama's birth certificate, was the first person off the plane in a life vest. Following her, and remaining close to her was her deputy director, Keith Yamamoto. For the first 25 minutes or so, the group floated close to each other. Then Fuddy and Yamamoto drifted off from the others. Less than 20 minutes later Fuddy was dead. Still in her life vest, which kept her afloat, Fuddy drowned. US Coast Guard swimmers found Fuddy's body floating about 200 yards from the nearest survivor. The investigation into Obama's forged birth certificate ended with Fuddy's death. Someone in the Hawaiian state government seemed to think that without Fuddy's confession, there was no case even though the fake birth certificate went from Fuddy to Judith Conley, a lawyer in the law firm of Perkins Coie. From there, the birth certificate was given to Obama who posted the forgery on the White House website. The next question within that first question is, if Barack Obama was a natural born citizen of the United States, he would have had a real Hawaiian birth certificate, so why would he need a phony one to post on the White House website?

And, finally, if Barack Obama was a real American citizen, why would he enroll in Occidental College in California as Barry Soetoro, a foreign exchange student during the Vietnam War—without a Selective Service card, which he would need if he was citizen (but wouldn't if he wasn't) since the US military cannot draft non-citizens? He didn't need a Selective Service card until he transferred from Occidental to Columbia University (as Barack Obama) in 1981 because in 1981, Obama burst from the bubble of alien obscurity to become a natural born American citizen with citizenship rights from England, Kenya and Indonesia.

And finally, at the end of his quest to convince the American people that he is an Article II natural born citizen is a puzzle—how a theoretically Hawaiian-born citizen, living in Hawaii could be issued a Connecticut Social Security number number (which Obama claims as his own). Adding to that dilemma is the fact that the number Obama claims as his own—042-68-4425—was issued to a French immigrant named Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born around 1890. Ludwig's use of 042-XX-XXXX is now in question—at least in the mind of attorney Orley Taitz. Information received by her under the Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] suggested that an emigrant named Harry Bouncel, who migrated to the Bronx from Russia in 1912, was issued that same social security number in 1935. But, regardless who reported it, according to the Social Security Administration, only two people have ever used that social security number and Bouncel is not one of them. One of them is Obama. The second one was Ludwig since he lived in Connecticut. Bouncel lived in New York and since 042 is a Connecticut number, Ludwig is the only person to whom the number could have been officially issued. None of those whose name is associated with that SS number could have been Barack Obama since, according to the Social Security Administration, social security numbers are not recycled and will not be any in the foreseeable future.

Given the 9-digit configuration of the social security number there are about a billion combinations that can be issued. To date, the government has issued about 450 million social security numbers. With talk of converting the 9-digit social security number to a 20-digit global unique identifier the combinations which will feature 6 fixed numbers and 122 random numbers and, if ever needed, letters. The total number of unique numerical GUIDs is 5.3 x 10 to the 36th power. Add the 26 letters of the alphabet to the mix, and the combinations becomes almost limitless—enough unduplicated personal identifiers to assign a 20 or 36 digit identifier to every man, woman and child on Earth.

What am I saying? I'm saying that those who believe Obama was deliberately assigned Ludwig's social security number by the Social Security Administration (which, his defenders claim, has run out of unused social security numbers is now recycling the numbers of deceased people) are either honestly mistaken, misled, or they are deliberately lying in order to mislead others. If two or more names are attached to any social security number it is only because all but the original person who was legally assigned that number by the Social Security Administration based on the State they were born in, stole the number for their own illegal purpose.

We know Obama was a naturally-born British citizen—and still is today. He is also a naturalized citizen of Indonesia. The only country he's lived in where he is not a citizen is...you guessed it—the United States. We know for any man to be elected President of the United States he must not only be a citizen of the United States, he must be a natural citizen of the United States.

According to Emer deVattel, the author of The Law of Nations and the father of international common law as adopted by the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, more is needed to determine natural citizenship than just having the good fortune of being born here today. Mexicans and other Central Americans sneak across the border to have anchor babies, believing that having an American baby will provide them with the visa they need to stay. Anchor baby claims of asylum don't work in any other nation on Earth because citizenship is based on more than just being born in a particular country, its based on where your father—not your mother—was born. Your mother gives you life. For good or bad, your father gives you roots. There is no free pass to citizenship anywhere else in the world because freedom is not, and never should be, free. Things that are free have no true intrinsic value. The price our forefathers paid for freedom for their families was their own shed blood. Thousands of them died to break the yoke that shackled them to a tyrant king and an island nation 4.417 miles away from freedom.

As I wrote these words, I thought, I have proven my case that Barack Hussein Obama was never eligible to run for federal office—neither as a US Senator nor as President. But, I realized the "why" was not answered. The why provide insight to the collusion between the princes of industry, the barons of banking and Barack Obama. By himself, a junior senator from the State of Illinois lacked the political wherewithal and financial power to completely obliterate his entire life from August 4, 1961 until today. Yes, today. The things Obama did yesterday have become the property of history's revisionists today. Transparency? In Obama's world, transparency does not exist. In Obama's world "transparency" and "opaquity" are synonyms not antonyms. In Obama's world, truth is a luxury government cannot afford.

As a 3rd grader at the St. Francis of Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, Obama was told that he would be a ruler, and freely shared that information with classmates. Because he was a 9 year old boy he believed he was either Kenyan royalty or an Indonesian prince. He was convinced that, when he grew up, he would be the leader of one of those two countries.

Was Obama a Manchurian candidate from age 9? Who told him what the priest in charge of the St. Francis of Assisi school said was relayed to him about Obama's future as a national leader? In 1970, Obama's mother (now referring to herself as Ann Dunham), worked for the Ford Foundation and consulted for the United States Agency for International Development and the Asian Development Bank in Pakistan. Both of Obama's American grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunhan were members of the Communist Party of the United States. Stanley Dunham, Stanley Ann's father, who is generally presented as a working class, barely successful communist sympathesizer, worked for Standard Oil, and later for David Rockefeller who became the driving force behind the Rockefeller family wealth. Dunham also had also developed fairly close ties to former Carter National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1972 when Rockefeller created the Trilateral Commission and appointed Brzezinski to head it. Brzezinski also served as the head of the Council on Foreign Relations. Barack Obama first met Brzezinski while he was studying at Columbia, shortly after he transitioned from Soetoro to Obama. Suddenly, neither the Obamas nor the Dunhams look like the working class families we've been led to believe they were. Turns out they were insiders or, at least, they worked on the cusp of real power.

Manchurian candidates in our society are not as much of a rarity as you might think. They are groomed for their roles in the shadows of political obscurity—sometimes for years and sometimes for decades—waiting for the moment when the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business can use them for their own nefarious purposes. Not all of them will be presidents or prime ministers, some may be Senators from Arizona or Massachusetts, and others may be judges or generals. At "their moment," they will thrust to the center stage, into the political limelight for all of the world to bask in their popularity.

From the end of World War II, the princes of industry have been grooming candidates for greatness whose role it will be, when the time is right, to dismantle the greatest nation on Earth, the United States of America. Because as long as freedom exists, world government cannot. As long as the United States is the best armed nation on Earth, the boots of our enemies will not walk our streets.

Thanks to the Council on Foreign Relations, Rockefeller's Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission, the industrial might of the United States that won both World War I and World War II has been broken up like the toys of a spoiled child, and dispersed to our enemies. We, the people of the United States, no longer possess the manufacturing wherewithal to hold our enemies at bay while our factories churn out the weapons of war needed to prevail because those factories are now closed and the products we made are now being made by our enemies.

All that protects the American people today is what's left of the frayed Bill of Rights, in particular the somewhat shredded 1st and 2nd Amendments that protect our right to worship God whenever and wherever we wish to pray to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and the right, given to us by God, to own and possess firearms in order to defend our homes, our families, and what's left of our nation.

The Amalekites in Washington, DC who are determined to destroy God are also determined to weaken America sufficientlyso that its enemies can destroy the nation God raised up to protect His creation. Obama, the Islamofascist, like the social progressives allied with him, who have not been able to repeal the 2nd Amendment, are determined to erase it by Executive Order simply by denying whatever classes of people he fears most the right to possess firearms. Once Obama succeeds in abolishing the rights of "the few," the rights of "the many" will be gone as well.

During the Clinton years, and again under the interloper in 2013, the far left socialist Southern Poverty Law Center, founded in 1971 by Morris Dees and Julian Bond, declared all U.S. military veterans were enemies of its government and argued that veterans, particularly retired veterans and those veterans who served in Iraq, should not be allowed to possess weapons. Why? Because, as Sen. Diane Feinstein argued in a hearing to ban military veterans from owning firearms, the returning vet might have PTSD and may turn on their family, friends or neighbor. I may be wrong, but I don't think a single mass murderer in the United States has ever been found to be a veteran with PTSD. Democrats believe when you grab for straws, always grab the biggest straw you can find. That argument, by the way, is the joint myth of the FBI colluding with the US Dept. of Veterans Affairs. The fairy tale originated in 2012, a year before the Southern Poverty Law Center began to banter it around the Hill.

Each month the VA Information Technology Center provides the FBI with an encrypted "Watch List" CD of suspect veterans who might be suffering from PTSD—even thought most of the 129,440 names on the July 12, 2012 CD had never been examined by VA doctors. What determines their "instability" according to a report first obtained by The Daily Caller in 2012, was how well the veterans manage their VA benefits. Thus, if a veteran is behind in his or her monthly obligations, he or she may be suffering from PTSD and should not be allowed to own a weapon.

The reality is, the totalitarians funding the social progressive wingnuts in Washington, DC and 50 State capitals, know when they make the move they will ultimately make to nullify the Bill of Rights and replace it with the UN Bill of Human Rights which is broken into the UN Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. None of these four documents guarantee you the right to protect yourself with a firearm. And, all of the rights detailed in these four documents are retractable. The governments of the signatory nations can repeal them at will. Why? Because the right to own and carry firearms assures that all other rights a free people enjoy are permanent.

When US v Miller 307 US 174 was decided in 1939, Associate Justice William O. Douglas (a liberal FDR appointee) noted in the majority opinion that "...based on the privileges standardized by the States in the 18th century..." (which was, and still is, the superior government of the United States) "...the general public—not the State-controlled militias—has to be as well-armed as its central government since the people, and the States, view the federal government as much, if not more, a threat to liberty than any foreign intruder on American soil."

The American people need to heed Justice Douglas' prophetic words because we have reached that period in the twilight of America's existence when the Amalekites now possess Washington and are storming the gates of the cities and towns of America with unlawful edicts designed to erase our protection under the Constitution in order to destroy this nation and prepare it for its submissive entrance into what President George H.W. Bush called "the New World Order." It will be a brief topsy-turvey world order. It will last seven years and will end with the destruction of what author Hal Lindsey intuitively called "the late, great planet Earth" in the 1970s. Well, for what it's worth, once again, you have my two cents worth on this subject. Until next time...if there is one...