The people the Global Money Barons Don't Want...from
babies to grandmothers and sick people in between. Those the government is killing at both ends of the age corridor.

Once you have all the money in the world, there are two things you don't want. First, you don't want a crowded world that encourages territorial strife and war; and second, you want a sufficient abundance of natural resources, food stuffs and all of the material things that the wealthy expect as their due. The Rockefeller clan, from John D. Rockefeller, Sr. in the 1880s to his grandson David in the 1960s, believed the world was rapidly becoming so overpopulated that people would soon decimate all of Earth's natural resources leaving a barren, desolate planet due to man destroying his ecosystem.

You've seen Hollywood's stock movie flicks about the doomsday catastrophies of man caused by man destroying his ecosystem beginning with the 1951 movie promoting the United Nations in "The Day The Earth Stood Still" and the Charlton Heston flick "Planet of the Apes" [1968] where war was the culprit destroying the planet; and a double dose of movies like "Solyent Green" [1973] and the 2011 TV miniseries "Terra Nova." Where "Planet of the Apes" dealt with humans destroying mankind through war, "Solyent Green" and "Terra Nova" dealt with industrial and man-made pollutants destroying the planet. Mixed in was a whole cistern of celluloid, including "The Day After Tomorrow" which is notable only because the movie's producer allowed Al Gore, Jr. to use its made-up footage from the movie to convince his audience (who had not yet seen "The Day After Tomorrow" movies) that global warming was causing the Arctic ice to melt and the Antarctic ice shelf to begin breaking apart. Preceding them were movies like "Catagory 6.5," Catagory 7," "Day of Destruction," and "10.5 Apocalypse" as well as a myriad of other nickel and dime movies which blame man for the weather that is caused exclusively by the solar cycles of our sun that create both global warming and cooling that Al Gore and and the eco-thieves blame on man and flatulating cows.

When Gore brought "An Inconvenient Truth" to England and tried to show it to school children, the British high court would not allow the film to be shown in England without an explicit disclaimer denouncing the movie as lacking in fact. Inconveniently, Gore's Hollywood production, like the movies you watch on the silver screen (even those which are touted as factual biographies of both conservative and liberal politicians) are pretty much made up. Movies about former presidents are scripted to make conservatives like Ronald Reagan look bad and greedy tyrants like John Adams, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and, of course, Barack Obama, look like what they weren't—honest men.

When you listen to the UN Population Fund, the UN in general, or the World Health Organization they never speak of euthanasia as necessary because there are over 7 billion people on planet Earth. They speak benignly about "sustainability" and its partner, "sustainable development," like they want create a world in which all of us can live and prosper.

But, if you listen closely, there are new catch-phrases incorporated in the sustainability dialogue as the UN, WHO and the United States under then newly elected Barack Obama talked more about "stabilizing" the world population instead of sustaining it. But that talk didn't begin until 2010 after Obama successfully, unconstitutionally and illegally enacted Obamacare (a year after the Democrats covertly buried Obama's Death Board (The Independent Payment Advisory Board) in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Feb. 17, 2009. Obama felt pretty good about hiding a right to kill off sick or perfectly healthy old people who had lived far beyond the 1933 actuarial lifespan of 61 years for men and 67 years for women because he knew when word leaked that there was a Death Board in Obamacare, the American taxpayers would be all over every word in the Affordable Care Act. Only, the Death Board is not there.

The Affordable Care Act exists for one purpose. And that purpose is not providing healthcare for American taxpayers. Every nation in the world except the United States which offers its taxpayers an old age pension also offers that worker a healthcare system

When your children celebrated Halloween—Trick-Or-Treat—this year and last, you never realize that the US Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare, Medicaid, the public health system throughout the United States, the US Veterans Administration, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Population Fund were playing a very deadly game of Trick-or-Treat on the people of the world—except, of course, the elitist rich and powerful princes of industry, the barons of banking and business and the pompous politicians who write the laws dictated by the money barons—who are exempt from the laws that govern the rest of us.

In 1978 an imaginary man named Robert C. Christian hired Joe Fendley, Sr. to construct what would be called the Georgia Guidestones. The deal was transacted by Wyatt Martin, the President of the Granite City Bank in Elberton, Georgia. What is interesting about the Georgia Guidestones and the players whose names are tied to it, is that no one in Elberton or in Elbert County, Georgia ever heard or him, nor had ever met, Robert C. Christian, the illusionary man who paid about a quarter million dollars to construct the Guidestones. Martin insisted that he knew Christian and had personally transacted the deal with him. Trick or treat. The guidestones were constructed of pyramid blue granite in the winter of 1979. The structure was made from six 19 foot tall slabs of granite weighing approximately 238,000 lbs.

The most frightening statement on the Guidestones, which is written in Arabic, Chinese, English, Hebrew, Hindu, Russian, Spanish, and Swahili (with the capstone at the top of the structure containing a brief message written in four ancient languages: Babylonian, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Greek and Sanskrit.) What frightens people most about the Georgia Guidestones is the lie about who paid for its construction or why, and second because the Guidestones serves as a pledge by the princes of industry and barons of banking and business who paid for its construction was its first promise: to keep the world's population (which now totals somewhere between 7.1 and under 7.8 billion people) to no more than 500 million people to keep the global population "...in perpetual balance with nature."

There is little doubt in anyone's mind that the money which paid for the Georgia Guidestones (which Georgians call the "American Stonehenge") came from the pocket of David Rockefeller, one of the sons of John D. Rockefeller, Jr.

David Rockefeller was a mental clone of his grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, Sr., the scion of the wealthiest family on Earth—people are the scourge of the Earth. Left to their own devises, they would destroy what God created. David Rockefeller, now the head of the Rockefeller clan has often expressed the view that "...the negative impact of population growth on our planetary ecosystems is becoming appalling evident." It was David Rockefeller who funded the fear of over-population based in great part by fanning fear through the princes of industry-controlled media that the world was so heavily overpopulated that by the end of the 20th century half of the population on Earth would be starving and the other half would be killing them for what food was left. Fanning the fire was David Rockefeller who found eco-idiots like watermelon school teacher Paul Ehlrich who plagiarized a book written at the turn of the 18th century by Thomas Malthus, a botanist. Ehlrich named his version of Malthus' research "The Population Bomb."

Malthus roughly calculated the population of Europe in 1800, then factored the average annual birth rates, estimating the longevity of the people. Once he estimated the annual birth and death rates, he began to generationally grow the population from the year 1800 to 2000. Then, based on the crop yields that existed in the 18th century, Malthus calculated how much food would be available to feed the growing population. As his computations began, Malthus computed the additional amount of farmland that would have to be cultivated to feed the growing population. Then, as the population mushroomed, he was forced to reduce the available farmland which Malthus envisioned would be overrun with dwellings to house the burgeoning population. Based on early 18th century technology, Malthus saw a vastly overcrowded, diseased, world polluted by the waste of man and no longer able to sustain itself by the year 2000. Malthus envisioned a contaminated agricultural armageddon.

Malthus wrote his book two decades before the start of the industrial revolution, and a century before the pharmaceutical revolution. Malthus could not even begin to fathom the agricultural revolution in which farmland would yield twenty to a thousand times what farms in 1800 produced. Or the advancement of architectural technology that would allow man to build super skyscrapers—and pack over 8 million people in a 322 square mile area in New York alone. Malthus wrote from a primitive era. Ehrlich didn't.

Ehrlich, an educated man, had no excuse other than money for cloning Malthus's work and calling it modern science when Ehlrich deliberately didn't attempt to update Malthus's science. Ehrlich was not a stupid man. He was an ambitious, greedy man who was quick to learn there was a big market for ecoalarmist fiction. The first to jump on the Population Bomb like it was the Gettysburg Address was the man who convinced everyone else that Ehrlich's work was fact-in-the-waiting. His name was David Rockefeller.

Rockefeller bought thousands of Ehlrich's book and propelled it to a best seller. Joining him with thousands more copies which were donated to colleges and universities was the far left Pew Foundation (with ties to the Rockefeller oil interests) . Also tied to Rockefeller was the Carnegie Foundation (built from the fortunes of Carnegie Steel) who added additional thousands of book sales from the environmentalist Nature's Conservatory and the Sierra Club which propelled Ehrlich to the status of doomsday demigod. The Princes of Industry and their lackies in the environmental movement knew Ehrlich's theories were based on obsolete three century old quackery, but since the global elite believed that the wretched underclass was spoiling their planet it made sense to "thin out their ranks" a little—like by 90% to 95%.

During David Rockefeller's media campaign to convince the world that abortion would save the world from women who reproduce like rabbits, CNN Founder Ted Turner commented that "...a total population of 250 to 300 million people—a 95% decline from present levels would be ideal."

David Foreman, founder of Earth First, didn't believe Turner's cuts are good enough. "My three main goals," he said, "would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world." The talking heads for the world global elites, most of whom worked for the largest most liberal newspapers and magazines in the world, didn't want to tell you what their financial masters knew to be fact: If we eliminated the 95% of the population the rich want to abort or euthanize it would not suddenly usher in a a new "golden age," or a pristine world without wars or pollution. Because even in a world where only the rich exist, the fight for the pinnacle of the pyramid would continue because greed will exist as long as man exists.

The rich, who pretends that man, not the sun, causes both global warming and cooling; or that the Supreme Court gave the Environmental Protection Agency the right to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant—even though it produces the oxygen we breathe and the water which we drink (and grows the food we eat as well), by ruling that it's bad for us. The EPA, controlled by the global rich whose money elects not only the guy in the White House based on their whims and agendas, but those who vote "aye" or "nay" to enact or kill the laws written by the K Street lobbyists in Washington, DC or, in the Parliaments, the barristers in London and Brussels.

On Halloween, 2011, the Union Nations designated October 31 as "Seven Billion Person Day." Blogger Michael Snyder noted that the UN picked Halloween specifically to suggest just how scary it was to have 7 billion people on Earth. On the same day, several leftwing publications wrote articles about the Georgia Guidestones, raising the question: What is the ideal population of Earth?" At that moment the rich believed a half billion people would push the limits of reasonable sustainability. The "1st commandment" on the Guidestones was to "maintain humanity under 500 million to keep it in perpetual balance with nature." The global elite think in terms of mandatory numbers. The Georgia Guidestones was such a number. Fixed. Static. Low and never changing.

Independent people in a free society think in terms of personal liberty and voluntary rights. In his "Seven billionth person" article in The Guardian, Roger Martin agreed with the Guidestones, noting "...that all of the problems humanity faced would be easier to solve if there were less people running around on Earth."

Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, agrees with the global elites, "Cut the global population by 90% and there won't be enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage." There also won't be enough people left to resist. Jeffrey Sachs, Director of The Earth Institute was quoted in an article which appeared on CNN on Oct. 31, 2011:
"The arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge. What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full productive, prosperous life, and in which the planet's resources are sustained for future generations?"

What we have here is the government "trick or treat." There's no treats at either end of the age corridor—just tricks. The NGOs (non-governmenrt organizations) which are financed and controlled by the princes of industry and barons of business, and which control the world, is not using the seven billion milestone to search for better ways to increase productivity, increase awareness about sustainability by replacing resources at "Point A" with resources of equal or greater value from "Point B" without degrading or endangering the ecosysytem of either "Point A" or "Point B" in a way that distorts the "needed" balance of mankind. That can never be achieved as long as the global elite control the governments of this planet, and the NGOs that write the economic rules, or the global elite which control the money and the governments, since they will continue to define greatly reduced needs of people at both ends of the age corridor since they are convinced [a] too many people are being born each year, and [b] not enough people are dying during the same period of time.

That's why the global elite designated Halloween as Seven Billion People Day. Trick or Treat. And, since the global elite who were convinced the "sky was falling," and "the earth was flat," and that Earth was the center of the universe and not on one edge, and that every heavenly body in space revolved around Earth rather than all planetary orbs in space orbiting around its own sun regardless of its stage of development, and that lunar orbs sojourn around the living or dead planets to which it is gravitationally linked. And, of course, there is the latest "sky is falling" scheme which is making the global elite much, much wealthier than any "sky is falling" scheme. Particularly since the princes of industry allow themselves the right to tax the common idiots to pay the bill for the imaginary threats the global elite create as tools to control the lower class.

As Earth casually completes a solar cycle, those solar cycles bring warm or hot summers and light snowy or blistery icy cold winters, depending not what type of gas you use in your car, or whether or not the factories in your town, your State, country or hemisphere are causing so much pollution that the sky looks grey far more often than light blue.

None of the garbage spewed from the mouths of the eco-idiots is true. But as former Vice President Al Gore and current White House occupant Barack Obama have both said, "It doesn't matter. The debate is over." To the global elite, it's what they say it is only because they have the financial, political and economic power to enforce their will on that layer of society whose lives they control. There were approximately121.1 million families or 308,745,538 million people in the United States at the end of 2012 (excluding the American military veterans in VA hospitals and seniors on Medicare and Medicaid who were either being euthanized with morphine or placed on non-existent patient waiting lists and ignored by those who took the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm to their patients, and to do everything within their ability to heal them—or at least, prolong their lives until God, not a prescription drug, ended their lives.

The global elite, which tried for over six decades to reduce the 6.5 billion unwanted people from the third world through sterilization programs (usually concealed as vaccinations against deadly viruses since the Muslim and Catholic worlds oppose abortion and the Christian world opposes euthanasia, is now changing is thinking.

Prior to 1980, killing millions of men,, women and children was easy to accomplish. We are watching death consume thousands in the Muslim Middle East. Islam opposes abortion, and it opposes euthanizing people near the end of life because they live in extreme pain does not exist in Islam. The Qur'an, 39:10 makes it clear that "...Those who patiently preserve will truly receive a reward without measure. And bear in patience whatever (ill) maybe fall you: this, behold, is something to set one's heart upon "...the Islamic Code of Medical Ethics endorsed by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine (Islamic Organization of Medical Sciences, Kuwait, 1981, p. 65) includes: "Mercy killing, like suicide, finds no support except in the atheistic way of thinking that believes that our life on this earth is followed by void. The claim of killing for painful hopeless illness is also refuted, for there is no human pain that cannot be largely conquered by medication or by suitable neurosurgery..." Likewise, most religions in the emerging nations oppose abortion and euthanasia (particularly those religions which believe the soul of the departed returns to another lifeform, whether human or animal. Therefore, in Islam, the seeking of medical attention for all injuries and illnesses is mandatory: The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics (1981 p.67).

According to National Geographic Magazine between 1962 to 1973, social engineers in both the Muslim and Hindu world refused to use executive power to force either sterilization or euthanasia to reduce the population. Killing at both ends of the age corridor were procedures encouraged in the industrial world where the global elite who controlled the media and the politicians through the media were able to to dramatically increase the number of deaths by either denying procedures as too late, or claiming they would not be cost effective; because the veterans from World War II, Korea or Vietnam were draining too much from the VA system either in the form of retirement benefits or the super cost of what the VA decided were new classes of expensive pharmaceuticals that prolonged life, but were simply not financially cost effective based on the cost of the medication vs. the societal value the pharmaceutical would add to the life of the recipient.

Those in government whose families are immune from forced sterilization, or their stations in life exempt them from euthanasia—like Jeffrey Sachs, Director of the Earth Institute wrote in an online CNN piece in 2011—"The arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge. What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full, productive and prosperous life, and in which the planet's resources are sustained for future generations.? The...sustainable development is the stabilization of the global population. There is already occurring in high income and even some middle-income countries, as families choose to have one or two children on average. The reduction in fertility rates should be encouraged in poorer countries as well."

Roger Martin of the London, England Guardian noted about the same time that all of the problems that humanity is facing would be easier to solve if there were less people on the planet by saying, "all environmental, and many economic and social problems, are easier with fewer people, and ultimately more impossible to solve with more.On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best q1uqality of life for all is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more people there are, the less each can have. Fewer people means better lives."

Is that true? No. It's pure poppycock. The global elite are convinced that about 500 million or so around the world are sufficient for the world. While the rich think so, the reality is that eliminating 90% or so common workers will not usher in either a "golden age," or an an age of peace and harmony You and I know it's pure rubbish, but when you attend the Ivy League schools in America, this is the dribble you're taught. That to achieve global peace and erase racial bias, you have to eliminate the White race which is predominately responsible for racism..

We passed the Trick and Treat event either called Halloween 2014 or simply Obama for short. Either way, it was a joke gone frightenly bad. Both have been meaningless. Halloween and Barack Obama. Both are Tricks with all the Treats going to the princes of industry, along with the barons of banking and business

If America doesn't wake up soon, when it does, it will realize that our children have inherited our stupidity. After all, stupid is what stupid sees and mimicks. If we want our nation back, then we'd better start mimicking the patriots who won this land from the British and built it into the greatest nation on Earth but decided apathy was easier than the struggle that would be necessary to keep this nation independently free and liberty both strong and pure. Because if we don't begin protecting our newborn Americans and protect the elderly whose sweat equity built America, all that will be left is the half million survivors of a dying world, wondering where all the people went.